Lack of refresher training leads to pinning and prosecution

An employer that failed to re-induct or provide refresher training to a worker, when he was transferred to a different department, has been fined for safety breaches, after the man was struck by a 2.3-tonne load in a forklift incident.


NSW District Court Judge David Russell convicted and fined Crawfords Freightlines Pty Ltd $90,000, after a 25 per cent discount for its plea of guilty to breaching sections 19 and 32 of the State WHS Act.


He found Crawfords should have implemented a safe work method for placing cardboard between bundles of aluminium billets being loaded into shipping containers, “whereby no more than one person at a time was inside any shipping containers in which a forklift was in operation”.


In September 2018, the worker was taping cardboard between billets, to prevent the billets from rubbing together, when the load from a forklift entering the shipping container he was in fell and pinned him against the wall.


Judge Russell heard the worker was assigned to the “alloy department” three days before he was struck.


He heard the worker undertook training in Crawfords’ standard operating procedures (SOPs) for operating forklift trucks, and for unloading and packing aluminium, when he was first employed at the company’s Sandgate site six months earlier.


The latter was not applicable to the work he performed when he first started, and when he was moved to the alloy department he was not re-inducted, retrained or provided with any refresher training on this SOP or on loading and packing aluminium generally, he heard. In any event, neither SOP specifically dealt with placing cardboard between bundles of aluminium billets.


The SOP for unloading and packing aluminium did prohibit personnel from being inside a container while it was being loaded, except when disconnecting slings or straps, but there was “no specific prohibition against workers remaining inside a shipping container when placing cardboard between aluminium billets, while forklift trucks were also being operated inside the same container”, Judge Russell noted.


He also found Crawfords had a job cycle observation system for assessing adherence to SOPs, but no formal process for tracking whether its compliance team, supervisors or leading hands were applying it.


Judge Russell said Crawfords’ failure to train the worker in a safe method for placing cardboard within the shipping container gave rise to a high likelihood of him being struck by a falling load while standing near a forklift.


He said there would not have been a significant burden or cost involved in ensuring the worker’s safety, as the employer did promptly after the incident.

Its responses included changing its system of work to require forklift operators to work alone packing billets into shipping containers, and to position and tape the cardboard against the billets while the forklift was not in operation, he heard.


Judge Russell took into account the fact that both the injured worker and the forklift driver involved in the incident were ticketed and trained in the employer’s general prohibition against workers being inside shipping containers when forklifts were operating.


“I find that the level of culpability of Crawfords is in the lower half of the mid-range,” he said in finding the appropriate pre-discount fine was $120,000.


SafeWork NSW v Crawfords Freightlines Pty Ltd [2021] NSWDC 442 (27 August 2021)

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts