Safety specialist reasonably advised drug test of worker

A worker claiming he accidentally ate cannabis cookies before failing a workplace drug test has failed to overturn his dismissal. He argued his employer unreasonably subjected him to the test when he wasn’t displaying any behaviour or symptoms of intoxication or impairment.


Fair Work Commissioner Alana Matheson accepted the employer’s submission that his managers had sufficient concerns about his performance and behaviour to request he take a test.


In Sydney, the Commissioner heard that early this year, Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd stood the IT project manager down over allegations he had appeared to be under the influence of drugs and alcohol while at work.


She heard two of his colleagues told the employer that on one afternoon they witnessed him slurring his speech, swaying, talking with his eyes closed and repeating himself, making one of the colleagues feel unsafe.



Wilmar found there wasn’t enough evidence to take any disciplinary action against him, but upon his return to work he was subjected to a drug and alcohol test that returned a result of 967ug/L for cannabinoids.

This was 19 times higher than the cut-off level prescribed by the employer’s “fit for duty procedure” and the worker was sacked.

He claimed unfair dismissal, telling the FWC the result came as a shock and he subsequently learned that prior to the test, he unknowingly ate cookies containing cannabis that his partner brought home from a party.


He argued the dismissal was unfair because the test detected residual trace elements of something he unintentionally consumed and he was not “under the influence” at the time.


He was approached upon his return to work and targeted for “reasonable cause” testing under the procedure, despite not showing any symptoms or behaviour to suggest he was intoxicated or impaired, he claimed.



The employer’s actions were unreasonably based on an “unsubstantiated assumption” that he had been intoxicated at work in April, he said.

Wilmar told the FWC its fit-for-duty requirements, which the worker was dismissed for breaching, weren’t focused on the perceived impairment of a worker but on what cut-off levels were acceptable to the business.

It said its managers held reasonable concerns over the worker’s behaviour, attendance and performance leading up to its request that he take a drug and alcohol test, to ensure the safety of everyone in his team.


The test had been recommended by its head of safety, to ensure it was safe for him to return to work, it said.


“I accept that [these managers] held concerns for the safety and welfare of the [worker] and others in the workplace, had a duty of care under work health and safety laws and acted on the recommendation of [Wilmar’s] health and safety specialist in requesting the reasonable cause testing,” Commissioner Matheson said.


Their concerns met the criteria for requesting staff to undertake reasonable cause testing under the fit-for-duty procedure, she found in dismissing the worker’s case.


She found the worker’s claim that he unintentionally consumed cannabis was “questionable” and irrelevant “to an assessment of [his] failure to comply with the fit-for-duty procedure as a reason for dismissal”.



The Commissioner referred to Sydney Trains v Gary Hilder [2020] FWCFB1373, where an FWC full bench upheld the reinstatement of a safety-critical rail worker who failed a cannabis test (see related article), but stressed it would place employers in an “impossible position” if they had to demonstrate “intentionality” to enforce workplace safety policies.

Masters v Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd T/A Wilmar Sugar [2021] FWC 6230 (28 October 2021)


This article was produced and originally posted by OHS Alert – Premium news and analysis for Australian workplace safety and workers’ compensation professionals.

TAG :- Drug Test, Drug Testing, Fwc

Contact Us

Zenergy News

February 11, 2025
A workplace health and safety regulator has explained what the "safest workplaces" look like, in revealing it finalised more than 100 successful safety prosecutions in 2024.
February 11, 2025
Two years after the release of the groundbreaking 2022 Everyday Respect Report, Rio Tinto has undertaken a thorough Progress Review to assess its ongoing cultural transformation. As one of the world’s largest mining companies, Rio Tinto has been working to create a safer, more inclusive workplace culture that fosters respect, productivity, and innovation. The 2024 Progress Review highlights significant strides made, ongoing challenges, and areas requiring further attention. The Journey Towards Cultural Transformation Cultural change is a multi-year effort that requires consistent leadership, structural support, and engagement across all levels of an organization. Since launching its Everyday Respect initiative, Rio Tinto has embedded this agenda into its core business strategy, focusing on reducing bullying, sexual harassment, and racism in the workplace. Key Progress Areas: Increased Awareness and Open Conversations: The public release of the original report acted as a catalyst for change, encouraging more employees to speak up and engage in discussions about respect. Stronger Leadership Commitment: Leaders are playing a more proactive role in championing Everyday Respect, with a focus on psychological safety and inclusive leadership. Enhanced Training and Education: Programs such as Everyday Respect Training and Purple Banners have been widely implemented to build awareness and response capabilities. Facility Upgrades and Safety Improvements: Investments in workplace infrastructure have improved the physical environment, making it more inclusive and conducive to employee well-being. Greater Workforce Diversity: There has been a notable increase in gender and cultural diversity across teams, fostering innovation and improved workplace dynamics. Ongoing Challenges and Areas for Improvement Despite progress, resistance to change remains an obstacle, particularly among certain groups. Survey data indicates that while improvements have been perceived in many areas, instances of bullying, sexual harassment, and racism persist. Key focus areas include: Building Stronger Buy-in: Engaging those who are resistant to cultural change, particularly male employees, to foster a collective commitment to Everyday Respect. Enhancing Reporting Mechanisms: Increasing trust in reporting systems to ensure that employees feel safe and supported when raising concerns. Strengthening Frontline Leadership: Providing additional training and tools to equip supervisors and managers with the skills needed to drive culture change at all levels. Maintaining Momentum: Ensuring that Everyday Respect remains a priority in the face of organizational changes and external pressures. Looking Ahead: Staying the Course The findings from the 2024 Progress Review reaffirm Rio Tinto’s commitment to long-term cultural transformation. While meaningful progress has been made, continued efforts are needed to sustain positive momentum and address persistent challenges. As one employee noted: “ Change is definitely happening, and it will get hard at times. We can’t back away ... I’m here at Rio Tinto because I want to see through this change. We need to stay the course. ” With ongoing leadership, engagement, and strategic initiatives, Rio Tinto is on the path to embedding Everyday Respect across all facets of its global operations, ensuring a safer, more inclusive, and more productive workplace for all employees. See full report “ here ”.
By Shazamme System User October 8, 2024
Australia's dating apps are getting a safety makeover.
By Shazamme System User October 8, 2024
National Safe Work Month
September 19, 2024
Meet the Outstanding 2024 Winners
Australia's highest WHS fine, for manslaughter, becomes law
September 19, 2024
NSW's industrial manslaughter laws
More Posts
Share by: