Do My Drivers And Loaders Need Load Restraint Training?

Graeme Agnew, Senior CoR Consultant and Trainer – Zenergy Professional Services, is internationally recognised as an expert in the field of heavy vehicle safety tells us that a couple years ago, he asked a driver how he knew what restraint his load required. He replied his load weighed forty tonnes and he applied one 10-millimetre chain, which were rated to ten tonnes on each corner, four in total, to achieve forty tonnes of restraint.


Graeme’s experience is that many drivers apply this same logic. Unfortunately, it’s not that simple as correct restraint relies on multiple factors – friction, lashing angle, etc – not just the lashing’s capacity. In this case, even if this was correct only the two rear chains would have prevented forward movement, as the front chains would have loosened in an emergency braking incident.


Finally, 10-millimetre transport chain is only rated to six tonnes not ten. When Graeme pointed out the hook was marked six-tonne the driver attempted to convince him this was its lifting capacity until we consulted the Load Restraint Guide. It was evident the load was well short of the legal requirement to restrain 80% of its weight in the forwards direction.


When asked whether he had any load restraint training, the driver told Graeme he had been driving a truck since he was a boy – both his grandfather and father were truck drivers. The reality is most drivers and loaders have not received formal load restraint training. They have been taught to restrain loads by older colleagues or have learnt through trial and error. The load arrived without moving so the restraint must be correct. The absence of prior incidents is not evidence that loads are legally secured.


The driver added he now runs the family business and had sixty-three drivers carting heavy haulage along the east coast. When Graeme enquired about what training his drivers received, he replied that load restraint training was not a legal requirement and should an issue arise, he could prove they were competent because knew the blokes.


Drivers have told Graeme in many circumstances that all they had to do to get their licence was throw a strap over the load and tension the binder, there was no training in factors such as the impact of friction or angles. Unlike an electrician or plumber beyond an appropriate licence there is no mandatory load restraint qualification to drive a heavy vehicle.


So, is load training a legal requirement? 


Under the Heavy Vehicle National Law parties in the Chain of Responsibility have a primary duty to eliminate or minimise potential risks associated with transport activities, as far as reasonably practicable. Based on the risk of a load shifting or becoming dislodged it would be difficult to justify that ensuring those loading and transporting goods were competent in securing loads was not reasonable.


How can Zenergy assist to demonstrate I have met my legal requirements?



Zenergy has a team of industry experts that can analysis your training needs and provide either general load restraint training or develop and deliver tailored specific training to meet the needs of your business or industry.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Fake Safety Certificates: An HSE Hiring Wake-Up Call
By Dean Woods • October 19, 2026
WorkSafe Victoria is investigating fake safety qualifications. How employers should verify tickets, licences and real competency when hiring HSE talent.
Zenergy Take 5: WHS News for the Week of 19 October 2026
By Dean Woods • October 19, 2026
Queensland’s psych injury claims shake-up, fake safety certificates under investigation, fresh job market data and this week’s featured HSE role.
Zenergy Congratulates the 2026 AWHSA Finalists
By Dean Woods • October 13, 2026
Zenergy is proud to sponsor the 2026 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards. Meet the 52 finalists ahead of the Sydney gala on 12 November.
By Dean Woods • October 13, 2026
Welcome to Take 5, Zenergy's weekly five-minute scan of what's moving in Australian workplace health and safety, workers compensation and people & culture — five items, one featured senior role, every source named. This week: a hard regulatory deadline lands on the calendar, Safe Work Month hits its stride, and Safe Work Australia publishes the clearest picture in years of who is actually exposed to harm at work. 1. New workplace exposure limits commence 1 December — including Australia's first diesel particulate limit The transition period for Safe Work Australia's updated workplace exposure limits (WELs) for airborne contaminants ends on 1 December 2026. The list introduces Australia's first national exposure limit for diesel particulate matter — 0.01 mg/m³, measured as respirable elemental carbon — alongside revised limits for a range of other contaminants. Regulators are telling duty holders to use the remaining weeks to review exposure monitoring, confirm controls are effective, and prioritise elimination and engineering controls over reliance on RPE. If your operations involve diesel plant in enclosed or poorly ventilated environments — distribution centres, tunnels, underground mining, workshops — this is the compliance item to table at your next leadership meeting. Safe Work Australia has published guidance and a transition toolkit, and state regulators including SafeWork SA have flagged the change, as has NOPSEMA for offshore operators. Sources: Safe Work Australia — Changes to Workplace Exposure Limits (safeworkaustralia.gov.au); SafeWork SA — Get ready for new Workplace Exposure Limits (safework.sa.gov.au); NOPSEMA — Diesel engine emissions: new workplace exposure limit takes effect December 2026 (nopsema.gov.au). 2. Dates ahead: Safe Work Month's “for health” week and World Mental Health Day National Safe Work Month is underway, with Safe Work Australia's 2026 theme “Safe work is for life” running week-by-week focuses: “for health” (week two, this week), “for the future” (week three) and “for all” (week four). World Mental Health Day falls on Saturday 10 October, inside Mental Health Month — a natural prompt to put psychological health on the toolbox agenda, not just the poster wall. Regulators are active too: SafeWork NSW opened the month with a compliance operation targeting the meat processing sector. Sources: Safe Work Australia — National Safe Work Month (safeworkaustralia.gov.au/national-safe-work-month); SafeWork NSW — news, 1 October 2026 (safework.nsw.gov.au). 3. People & culture: FWO recovers $453 million for workers in 2025–26 The Fair Work Ombudsman's 2025–26 results, released 14 September, show $453 million recovered for underpaid workers across the year, with Ombudsman Anna Booth urging employers to find “compliance common ground”. For employers, the signal hasn't changed: payroll governance, award classification and record-keeping sit alongside WHS as enterprise-level compliance risks — and the regulator's recovery capability keeps growing. Worth a standing item on the people & culture risk register, especially for businesses with large award-covered or labour-hire workforces. Source: Fair Work Ombudsman media release, 14 September 2026 (fairwork.gov.au/newsroom). 4. Job market pulse: national vacancies ease, HSE demand holds The ABS's August 2026 Job Vacancies figures (released 1 October) show 325,000 vacancies nationally — down 0.9% over the quarter and 1.3% over the year, and 31.2% below the May 2022 peak. Private sector vacancies fell 2.0% for the quarter while public sector vacancies rose 7.8%. Health care and social assistance remains the deepest vacancy pool at 54,300. Against that gently easing backdrop, safety hiring is holding its ground from WHS advisors in Melbourne manufacturing to safety leadership in Queensland logistics — a spread we read as steady, sector-broad demand for proven operators rather than a hiring spike. Sources: ABS — Job Vacancies, Australia, August 2026 (abs.gov.au); 5. Industry story of the week: 68% of workers likely exposed to at least one hazard Safe Work Australia's newly published Worker Exposure Survey finds 68% of Australian workers are likely exposed to at least one physical or chemical hazard at work, with 28.9% experiencing high-level exposure. Solar UV is the most common hazard (an estimated 4.87 million workers), silica exposure covers an estimated 2.04 million workers and is heavily concentrated in construction and mining, and apprentices and trainees are disproportionately exposed across heat, silica, lead and asbestos. Construction, agriculture and mining are the industries most likely to see multiple hazard exposure. It's the week's most important read for HSE leaders — and the subject of this week's Zenergy deep-dive, where we unpack what the numbers mean for exposure monitoring, young-worker supervision and the 1 December exposure limit deadline. Sources: Safe Work Australia — Worker Exposure Survey (safeworkaustralia.gov.au); Safety Solutions, 28 September 2026 — “Over two-thirds exposed to a physical or chemical hazard, workers survey reveals”
By Dean Woods • October 7, 2026
Safe Work Australia's Worker Exposure Survey finds 68% of workers exposed to hazards. What HSE leaders should do before new limits land on 1 Dec.
City skyline at sunset with tall modern buildings under a colorful orange and blue sky
September 16, 2026
Explore the latest Safe Work Australia updates for 2026, including WHS penalties, incident notification, AI, chemical exposure limits and regulatory changes.
More Posts