Compo refused: cause of accident disputed

A worker has has failed to establish a sufficient link between a fall from a ladder and a dusty site, while another employee failed to prove a prior compensable injury caused a subsequent slip injury.


Dusty site not cause of fall

The plaintiff fell from a ladder while working at a building site. He claimed he slipped because of dust on the ladder that should have been cleared from the building site. He sued the head contractor for failing to keep the site sufficiently dust-free. However, both the NSW District Court and the Court of Appeal found the plaintiff had failed to show the connection between the incident and the dust at the site.


Glazier seriously injured

Mr M, a glazier, was seriously injured when he fell at work at a construction site in Sydney in December 2011. He had been installing the window of an office partition as part of the refurbishment of the fourth floor of the building when he fell.

In the NSW District Court there were a series of conflicts in the testimonial and documentary evidence. While the court assessed his damages at $721,611 if negligence was established, it found that Mr M had failed to establish causation, and therefore made no award.


Appeal rejected

The NSW Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and found the cause of the accident was not explained:

“It was not sufficient for Mr M merely to disprove some other explanation for the accident (such as silicone, or misjudging a step). Building sites are dusty. As it was put during the trial, the site was ‘not a hospital’. Questions of the amount of dust were important if Mr M were to discharge his burden of proving that the quantity of dust on the ladder was causally connected with his accident.

“We do not accept Mr M’s submissions based on common sense. Common sense cannot, in a case such as this, discharge the onus borne by Mr M.” … It cannot be said that ‘common knowledge’ provides an answer to the question of whether a person wearing work boots is more likely to slip on the step of a ladder if there is an (unidentified) amount of dust on the step than if there is not. Workers on building sites, including painters patching walls, who constantly have to use dusty ladders in the course of their work, do so without slipping… “For those reasons, we would dismiss the appeal.”


Costs

Mr M was ordered to pay 80 per cent of the contractor’s costs of the appeal, not 100 per cent, as the defendant had extended the range of argument on appeal.

M v Sheldon Commercial Interiors Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 77 (15 April 2016)


Slip unrelated to compensable foot injury


Meanwhile, in a NSW workers compensation matter, a worker failed to prove that a compensable foot injury led to a slip injury.

There was inconsistency in the evidence and this told against the worker:

“I… note that Mr C said in his statement that his ‘foot suddenly went under me’. Mr C said he did not trip but that his foot bucked under him as his foot was still weak after recently coming off crutches. Mr C does not in his statement refer to feeling a ‘spasm of pain and lost his balance’ as recorded by Dr D.”

The court noted that “there also appears to be some inconsistency with the circumstances of how the event occurred as recorded in the reports of the respondent’s independent medical examiners”.

Another doctor made a report recording the history of the event as follows: “While recuperating at home he slipped and fell and in attempting to break his fall he reached out with his right upper limb and sustained a full thickness rupture of the right biceps tendon.”


C v Smith Bros Trade & Transport Terminal Pty Ltd [2016] NSWWCC 81 (29 March 2016) 


The bottom line: Although it is perhaps stating the obvious, there must be a change of causation established to successfully pursue a compensation claim.

This article was originally posted on Workplace OHS a part of NSW Business Chamber – Australian Business Consulting and Solutions has a dedicated team of WHS/OHS experts who can assist you with your specific WHS/OHS issues and problems.

Contact Us

Zenergy News

Directors' duties for psych risks unpacked in new report
April 23, 2025
The WHS obligations of company directors include taking reasonable steps to understand the psychological hazards in their workplaces, and this is a "personal" prosecutable duty, a new guide for directors warns. Directors' obligations include establishing that their organisations and their management "are equipped with appropriate resources and processes to eliminate or minimise these risks to the extent that is reasonably practicable", the guide by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and law firm King & Wood Mallesons says. Most of any organisation's work to address psychosocial hazards will be "driven by management", given the complexity of the risks and the deep operational knowledge required to guide action, it says. "The board plays a supporting role in constructively challenging these efforts and maintaining oversight of how effective psychosocial risk management contributes to broader organisational culture and leadership." Under Australia's national model WHS laws – adopted by all jurisdictions other than Victoria, which has similar legislation – officers have a duty to exercise due diligence to confirm their organisation is meeting its WHS obligations. (See section 27 of NSW's version of the laws, for example.) This duty is a "personal duty, meaning [officers] can be prosecuted for failing to meet their due diligence obligations", the guide says. "Prosecution typically requires proof that the officer failed to take reasonable steps to comply with their duty, assessed in the context of the organisation's overall safety and health management system," it says. These due diligence obligations apply to paid directors, and are "recommended" for volunteer directors, who can be prosecuted in limited circumstances. "While non-executive directors have not been the focus of WHS regulators to date, this can change, and regulatory expectations are rising," the guide notes. According to the 12-page document , company boards and governance play a crucial role in ensuring psychosocial risks are managed effectively. Directors must oversee management's efforts at identifying and implementing control measures, set expectations and confirm that the necessary frameworks are in place. "This includes seeking information, reviewing board reports, assessing organisational culture, and challenging management where needed to strengthen risk controls," the guide says. Examples of how boards should address the workplace factors that create psychosocial risks include: Overseeing how managers monitor the risks associated with work design by drawing on complaints data, employee surveys, and absence and turnover rates, and engaging regularly with management to assess risks and evaluate measures; Confirming that management is complying with the positive duty to eliminate workplace sexual harassment, and obtaining regular reports on key behavioural risks involving code of conduct breaches and harassment cases; Setting expectations for management to provide workers with practical assistance and timely consultation in the event of organisational change and restructures, which can create significant stress; Engaging with management to review how it is addressing remote work risks, and ensuring there they have a clear policy to guide them in determining when remote arrangements are appropriate; and Overseeing how HR and performance management processes are managed, and confirming that investigation procedures are fair, workers have access to appropriate support, and outcomes are handled as consistently as possible. Governing WHS Psychosocial Risks: A primer for directors, by the Australian Institute of Company Directors and King & Wood Mallesons, April 2025 This article has been reproduced with permission from OHS Alert, and the original version appears at www.ohsalert.com.au.
April 7, 2025
Zenergy recently hosted Women in Safety, a special networking event dedicated to fostering collaboration in the health, safety, and wellbeing sector. Held on March 20, 2025, at The Winery, Surry Hills, this event provided a relaxed and welcoming atmosphere where professionals gathered to exchange insights, share experiences, and build meaningful connections. With attendees from diverse industries—including construction, logistics, corporate sectors, and more—the event highlighted the vital role of women in shaping safer workplaces across Australia.
March 25, 2025
Podcasts have become a dominant force in the world of media, revolutionising how we consume information and entertainment and the WHS, Environment & Sustainability is no different! As the podcast industry continues to expand, listeners are discovering a wealth of benefits, from educational insights to fostering community connections. In this article, we share some of the leading podcasts and why they’ve become a growing part of modern WHS, Environment & Sustainability consumption. Here are some of the leading podcasts that every WHS, Environmental, and Sustainability professional should tune into:
March 24, 2025
Colin Hansen, WHS Director John Holland - M7M12 Project
March 3, 2025
Zenergy invites you to be part of the prestigious 2025 Australian Workplace Health & Safety Awards (AWHSA) —a national platform dedicated to recognising outstanding achievements in workplace health and safety. These awards celebrate individuals and organisations that are making a real impact in fostering safer, healthier work environments.
February 28, 2025
Australia has enacted mandatory sustainability reporting requirements, effective from 1 January 2025, through the Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Act 2024. These regulations mandate that large entities disclose climate-related financial information as part of their annual reporting obligations.
More Posts